<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://anthemmagazine.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://anthemmagazine.com/rss/story/1002</link>
 <description>Content view for all categories</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Book Critic: &quot;The Pitchfork 500&quot;</title>
 <link>http://anthemmagazine.com/story/1002</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Love it or hate it, &lt;a href=http://www.pitchforkmedia.com target=&quot;_new&quot;&gt;Pitchfork Media&lt;/a&gt; is the gold standard for music journalism on the Web. Sure, P4K may have one of the most bizarre rating systems ever, it may offend on occasion, and it may come off with an air of pretention, but in the end, you know you can&#039;t live without it. As the &lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt; put it, Pitchfork Media is &quot;one of the more important indie music tastemakers in any medium.&quot; This is most definitely true. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://anthemmagazine.com/node/1002&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://anthemmagazine.com/node/1002#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://anthemmagazine.com/taxonomy/term/68">book</category>
 <category domain="http://anthemmagazine.com/taxonomy/term/1361">Book Critic</category>
 <category domain="http://anthemmagazine.com/taxonomy/term/87">books</category>
 <category domain="http://anthemmagazine.com/taxonomy/term/1">Music</category>
 <category domain="http://anthemmagazine.com/taxonomy/term/53">music</category>
 <category domain="http://anthemmagazine.com/taxonomy/term/1360">Pitchfork Media</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:38:58 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>nik.mercer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1002 at http://anthemmagazine.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
